Decisions of the board of directors (supervisory board). From the Ministry of Defense to Russian Railways, and from Russian Railways to FSK (part of Rosseti) Board of Directors of the Federal Grid Company of the Unified Energy System

Public Joint Stock Company "Federal Grid Company of the Unified Energy System" was created in accordance with the program for reforming the electric power industry of the Russian Federation as an organization for managing the Unified National, All-Russian Electric Grid with the aim of its preservation and development. In this type of activity, the company is a subject of a natural monopoly. Electric grid facilities are located in 77 regions with a total area of ​​15.1 million sq km. Half of the total energy consumption of the Russian Federation is provided by electricity from the FGC UES company. It is a subsidiary of OJSC Rosseti.

The unified energy system of Russia is recognized as a “national asset and a guarantee of energy security” of the state. Its main part “is a unified national energy network, including a system of power transmission lines that unite most regions of the country and represents one of the elements guaranteeing the integrity of the state.” To preserve and strengthen, ensure the unity of technological management and implement state policy in the electric power industry, the creation of FGC UES is envisaged.

Board of the Federal Grid Company of the Unified Energy System

Zaragatsky Alexander Arkadievich - First Deputy Chairman of the Board

Filimonov Roman Evgenievich - First Deputy Chairman of the Board

Vodennikov Dmitry Aleksandrovich - Deputy Chairman of the Board, Chief Engineer of PJSC FGC UES

Molsky Alexey Valerievich - Deputy Chairman of the Board of PJSC FGC UES

Pozdnyakov Nikolay Igorevich - Member of the Management Board of PJSC FGC UES

Terebulin Sergey Sergeevich - Deputy Chairman of the Board of PJSC FGC UES

Tikhonova Maria Gennadievna - Deputy Chairman of the Board of PJSC FGC UES

Board of Directors of the Federal Grid Company of the Unified Energy System

Grachev Pavel Sergeevich - General Director of PJSC Polyus, General Director of LLC UK Polyus, Independent Director

Andrey Aleksandrovich Demin - Member of the Management Board of PJSC Rosseti

Kamenskoy Igor Aleksandrovich - Managing Director of Renaissance Broker LLC, Independent Director

Murov Andrey Evgenievich - Chairman of the Management Board of PJSC FGC UES

Poluboyarinov Mikhail Igorevich - First Deputy Chairman of Vnesheconombank, member of the Board of the State Corporation "Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs (Vnesheconombank)"

Prokhorov Egor Vyacheslavovich - Deputy General Director for Finance of PJSC Rosseti

Roshchenko Nikolay Pavlovich - Member of the Board, Deputy Chairman of the Board of JSC "ATS", Head of the Legal Department of the Association NP "Market Council"

Sergeev Sergey Vladimirovich - Deputy General Director for Capital Construction of PJSC Rosseti

Snikkars Pavel Nikolaevich - Director of the Electric Power Industry Development Department of the Russian Ministry of Energy

Ferlenghi Ernesto - President of the Association of Italian Industrialists "Confederation of Italian Industry", Executive Vice President of Eni for Market Development in Russia and Central Asia "Eni" S.p.A., Independent Director

Oksana Vladimirovna Shatokhina - Deputy General Director for Economics of PJSC Rosseti

07/22/2015, Media wars of the Ministry of Defense, Photo: IA "Arms of Russia", Illustrations: via b0ltay

Dear friends!

We publish some materials from the secretary's array Romana Filimonova. Filimonov at one time held the posts of vice-governor of St. Petersburg, Moscow region, head of the Construction Department of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, and now this respectable gentleman heads one of the structures of Russian Railways - the Central Directorate for Track Repair. Let's wish him prosperity in the field of developing funds for the repair of railway tracks :), and let's return to the array of his secretary - Ksenia Bolshakova. After studying Ksenia’s email array and devices that fell into our hands (by chance, of course), we came to the conclusion that Mr. Filimonov extremely rarely used the computer and the Internet, and most of the communications in this area fell on Ksenia’s fragile but reliable shoulders. Ksenia has accompanied Mr. Filimonov throughout almost his entire career and is his confidant in various non-public matters. Starting from unofficial PR of structures headed by Filimonov, distribution of funds between attracted trolls, organization of paid materials in the media (hello to the Kommersant newspaper and top bloggers!), etc. and so on. This is just a small part of what Mr. Filimonov has in his array. The array itself is still sold on the Information Exchange using the link.

We decided that it would help future buyers if we published a tiny part of the materials from this array...

Department of Defense media wars

It’s probably no longer a secret that not only private companies use paid publications in the media and armies of “trolls” in competition, but reputable government departments, even such as the Ministry of Defense, are actively involved in this. We bring to your attention several examples from the correspondence of Ksenia Bolshakova, assistant to the former head of the Construction Department of the Ministry of Defense:

The Construction Department of the Ministry of Defense has been waging a protracted media war with Spetsstroy for a long time. This letter discusses the topics of custom publications. Quoting Lavrentiy Pavlovich Beria also looks funny.


Another example, at the beginning of November 2014, a certain Anna Gryazeva sent Ksenia Bolshakova to edit an article on the topic “Spetsstroy is disrupting the deadlines for the rearmament of a group of Russian troops in the Southern Kuril Islands” authored by Kommersant journalist Ivan Safronov, who, by the way, distinguished himself with a number of articles exposing Spetsstroy.


The article is then promoted on social networks.


It is likely that all these custom publications are paid for from the budget of the Ministry of Defense, or rather from the pockets of taxpayers.


In addition to “working with the media and bloggers,” Bolshakova’s correspondence is full of examples of tasks for “trolls.” And reports on the work performed on posting paid comments on forums and media sites. I am especially pleased with the sincerity of the employees of the Ministry of Defense. From the “instructions” - “..we finally finished with this Olympics and decided to get down to business..”



An interesting clarification on the specifics of the work of “trolls” in various social networks:


[...]

P.S.
Having been working for a long time on various “trolls” and their “organizers,” we continue to be amazed at the moral “flexibility” and “comprehensiveness” of these people. So Ksenia, when Roman Filimonov was “asked” to leave the Ministry of Defense, and a new position was not yet planned for the chief, began feverishly looking for work. Here is a job posting from the Headhunter site based on her request, obviously based on her skills. Ksenia, agree!

19/08/2010

For more than a month now, the Military Field Surgery Clinic of the Military Medical Academy has been under siege. The access control regime has been strengthened so much that not even a mouse can get through, and the physiotherapy department is completely “classified”: it is there, they say, that the “chambers” of Vice-Governor Roman Filimonov, who broke both legs, are located. We were contacted by a reader who visited the Military Medical Academy clinic and told us the “case history” of a high official who recently left the hospital.


R Oman Filimonov was taken to the Military Medical Academy on the night of July 7. He was riding with a group of people on a yacht in the Gulf of Finland and suddenly fell overboard. The fall almost ended in tragedy: the vice-governor was pulled under one of the working screws. The official received open fractures of both legs and a closed fracture of the femur. In severe shock, he was taken to the intensive care unit of the Military Medical Academy.

It’s a strange thing, the witnesses to the emergency - those who were on the yacht with Filimonov - categorically refused to talk about what happened: not only to journalists, but even to law enforcement agencies who tried to verify the incident. The only thing the eyewitnesses were “split” about was that everyone present on the yacht was sober. The question involuntarily arises: what happened between them, the “sober” ones? The 13-meter yacht itself belongs to a private individual.

There were scant reports about the tall patient’s health: the next night after the emergency, his temperature rose to 37.9, then he began to recover.

Roman Filimonov’s colleagues also prefer to remain silent about what happened, but they try to brighten up his stay in the hospital. Every day, expensive foreign cars flocked to the Military Medical Academy: the vice-governor continued to resolve production issues, essentially turning his ward into a small branch of Smolny. But how difficult it must have been for him to work there! Did officials with briefcases really have to lay out papers on the bedside table, timidly sit down on the vice-governor's bed, and gradually straighten the patient's tangled sheet?

No matter how it is! A reader who visited the Military Field Surgery Clinic of the Military Medical Academy told us about how the tall patient lived and worked.
They say that the physiotherapy department where Roman Filimonov lies was partially rebuilt during the few days that the vice-governor spent in intensive care. Allegedly, part of the corridor and several offices were given over to his “apartments”, consisting of several rooms. In addition to the bedroom, there was allegedly a study, a dining room, rest rooms for visitors, a security room and a personal bathroom. The official quarters were said to have four strong guards on duty around the clock: two inside and two outside. The access regime in the department is almost like in Smolny. Naturally, the vice-governor was not fed from a hospital cauldron, and the cleaning inside was done not by hospital nannies, but by well-trained maids. When Roman Evgenievich celebrated his birthday on July 31 (he turned 42), all his rooms were literally littered with expensive bouquets. And the wheelchair of the injured vice-governor is no match for the hospital's junk: sophisticated, electric, with a remote control. “I wish we had those too!” - ordinary patients envy him.

It is clear that an official of this level cannot live in a general ward, but at whose expense are truly royal conditions created for him? Even if we leave aside the financial issue, there will still be problems with “living space”: after all, they say that a decent part of the clinic has been allocated for the apartments of the vice-governor! It seems that he moved into the premises that previously housed physiotherapy rooms. Because of this, doctors and unique equipment were exiled to the corridors. They say that medical devices were stuffed onto gurneys and placed in the halls and corridors of the hospital, and the physical therapists themselves wandered around other people's corners during working hours.

But recently, they say, the vice-governor’s mansions were empty: Roman Filimonov was allegedly taken to Germany for rehabilitation.

We turned to the chief of staff of Vice-Governor Roman Filimonov, Vasily Solovyov, for comments.
“Roman Evgenievich is feeling good,” Soloviev assured cheerfully. - He lies in the general department without any preferences.

According to the official, the vice-governor’s chamber is separate, but “ordinary”, and there is nothing “specific” about it. Vasily Solovyov is sure that the clinic has several separate rooms just like the one in which Filimonov was placed. He also said that the vice-governor, despite being on sick leave, works in full - every day for 8 hours.
“He reviews documents and resolves coordination issues,” explains Solovyov. - And the papers are signed by Vice-Governor Alexey Sergeev (he acts as Filimonov during his illness).
Vasily Solovyov resolutely denied rumors regarding Filimonov being sent for rehabilitation to Germany:
“Now he is on the territory of our vast homeland,” Solovyov said.

- But he’s still in the clinic?
“He is being treated here in St. Petersburg,” the official answered evasively.
This cheerful information was strangely refuted at the Military Medical Academy itself. We managed to talk with Valery Parfenov, head of the department of neurosurgery. The correspondent expressed concern about the health of Roman Filimonov and asked how he felt within the walls of the academy? To this Parfenov replied that there was no vice-governor in their institution, and now Filimonov was... in Germany.

- So, after all, he flew to Germany for rehabilitation? - the journalist clarified.
“Yes... He feels fine, everything is fine,” the colonel of the medical service immediately stopped short. - I don’t know where he flew off to, but he’s not at the academy. I can't help you.

- Is it true that his room was specially guarded?

- I don’t answer such questions. All the best! - Parfenov immediately hurried to say goodbye. However, after a small informational “puncture with Germany,” doubts involuntarily arise about the veracity of all the other “refutations” made by Filimonov’s chief of staff.

There is only one good thing about this whole story: it seems that the vice-governor is really on the mend.
When asked whether Roman Filimonov could already walk on his own, Vasily Solovyov did not want to answer. But I was pleased with the good news:
- We are expecting him at work by the first of September!
Truly, St. Petersburg and German doctors managed to create a real miracle. After all, when Roman Filimonov first got to the hospital, doctors made very cautious predictions regarding his recovery. Then, in early July, it was said that recovery could take several months. And now it turns out that Filimonov is ready to return to work in less than two months!
We wish Roman Evgenievich good health and a speedy return to duty .

The recent noise in the construction market of St. Petersburg, caused by the lack of permitting documentation, did not subside after the congress of the Union of Construction Associations and Organizations. Should we expect stagnation in the St. Petersburg real estate market, what to do with starving shareholders, and should there be continuity in the administration’s attitude towards large construction projects? The former vice-governor of St. Petersburg, Roman Filimonov, spoke about this in the site’s studio.

No matter what, the former vice-governor of St. Petersburg and professional builder Roman Filimonov does not yet see any serious problems. However, there are moments in the issuance of permits that he considers a very alarming signal that could lead to trouble in the future.

“I wouldn’t talk about stagnation in the construction industry,” says Roman Filimonov. “As they usually say, there is such a joke: if you want to help, don’t interfere. This is on the one hand. On the other hand, if you don’t help the construction industry, in terms of output distribution documents that local authorities are obliged to issue due to federal legislation, local legislation... If you simply don’t help and don’t issue these documents, then two or three months are enough to lead to a state of... Well, not exactly stagnation, and the directions are already in the negative direction. But today the construction market is in a normal state. Everything is in order. There is something to do, there is something to build. But the question of the future - it has been determined for now. If the construction market or builders, relatively speaking, then, what I call issuing distribution documents does not help... The market will simply choke and this will have a strong impact, including on prices.”

As for the shareholders who continue the hunger strike in the office of the Yabloko party, the administration needs to enter into a dialogue with the deceived citizens, the former vice-governor believes.

“It’s actually surprising to me that none of the leaders will go, meet and talk with shareholders,” says Roman Filimonov. “Neither committee chairmen, nor authorized vice-governors, as was usual. If such a situation arose in our country,” , we simply went out, talked to people, explained what was happening. Explained what could be done and what could not be done. If you remember, we also had such hunger strikes twice. We came, talked to people, found out their problems. then they honestly, frankly said that your problem is not solvable, because we do not understand whether you are a defrauded shareholder or you simply fall under an article of the Criminal Code for fraud in this case.”

Roman Filimonov left his post in the city government on January 20, 2012.He became one of the last vice-heads of the city to leave Smolny after the appointment of Georgy Poltavchenko. The first to resign were Alla Manilova, who was involved in culture, and Aleksey Sergeev, who managed public utilities. The vice-governor who oversaw finances, Mikhail Oseevsky, and Lyudmila Kostkina, who was responsible for the social block, also left the government.

At the moment, only two people remain from the “Matvienko team” in Smolny - Igor Metelsky, who is now in charge of the construction unit instead of Filimonov, the city property management units and land resources. And also the Vice-Governor for Security - Valery Tikhonov.

Roman Filimonov is 44 years old. In accordance with his first education, he has the specialty "electrical engineer". Until the mid-90s he served in the Russian Space Forces. After that, he held a position in the management of the construction company "REAL", worked in the development service of heat supply systems of the State Unitary Enterprise "Fuel and Energy Complex of St. Petersburg". Before becoming vice-governor, he was the head of the City Construction Committee for four years. In 2009, Roman Filimonov became the youngest vice-governor in Smolny, who was appointed during Matvienko's governorship.

He worked in this position for three years. Among the projects that Filimonov supervised were the construction of the Okhta Center, a public and business center in Lakhta, a stadium on Krestovsky, and a Stockmann department store at the intersection of Nevsky Prospekt and Vosstaniya Street.

It was believed that Roman Filimonov was one of the wealthiest members of the St. Petersburg government. This is despite the fact that his income in 2009, in accordance with the published declaration, amounted to slightly more than 1.110 million rubles. For comparison: Vice-Governor Alexey Sergeev declared income for 2009 in the amount of 6.71 million rubles.

The same document indicated that Filimonov and his family had a house with an area of ​​about 155 square meters. m and a plot of land slightly less than 480 sq. m. m. The list of property included a Bombardier jet ski, an all-terrain vehicle, a snowmobile, and two trailers for transporting a boat. The wife of the ex-vice-governor owned two apartments - 57 and 42 sq.m. and two cars - Mercedes-Benz GL500 4matic, Cadillac Escalade AWD. She also owned a Bombardier all-terrain vehicle and a Honda Gold Wing GL 1800 motorcycle.

After leaving the government, Filimonov returned to commercial construction. It was reported that he continued to work at the Venta-Stroy company, which he co-founded before starting work at Smolny.

Statement of material fact “On certain decisions adopted by the issuer’s board of directors”

1. General information
1.1 Full corporate name of the issuer Public Joint Stock Company “Federal Grid Company of the Unified Energy System”
1.2 Abbreviated corporate name of the issuer PJSC FGC UES
1.3 Location of the issuer 117630, Moscow, st. Academician Chelomeya, 5 A
1.4 OGRN of the issuer 1024701893336
1.5 INN of the issuer 4716016979
1.6 Unique issuer code assigned by the registration authority 65018-D
1.7 Internet page address used by the issuer to disclose information http://www..aspx?id=379;
http://www.fsk-ees.ru

2. Contents of the message
2.1. Quorum for the meeting of the issuer's board of directors:
10 members of the Board of Directors attended the meeting of the Board of Directors.
1 member of the Board of Directors did not participate in the meeting of the Board of Directors.
In accordance with clause 18.12 of Art. 18 of the Charter of PJSC FGC UES, the quorum for holding a meeting of the Board of Directors is at least half of the members of the Board of Directors of the total number of elected members of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES. There is a quorum.
2.2. Voting results and content of decisions adopted by the Issuer’s Board of Directors:
In connection with the proposal received from a member of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the Management Board of PJSC FGC UES, by decision of the present members of the Board of Directors of the Company, two additional issues were included in the agenda of the in-person meeting:
2. On approval of settlement agreements between PJSC FGC UES and PJSC Lenenergo, which are transactions in which there is an interest.
3. On approval of the agreement on the repayment of debt of IDGC of the North Caucasus PJSC for services for the transmission of electrical energy through the UNEG and the agreement on the repayment of bill debt between FGC UES PJSC and IDGC of the North Caucasus PJSC, which are transactions in which there is an interest .
Question No. 1: On the formation of committees of the Board of Directors and the plan of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES.
Decided:
1.1. Elect the following members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES:



1.2. Elect Igor Aleksandrovich Kamensky, a member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, Managing Director of Renaissance Broker LLC, as Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES.
1.3. Elect the following personnel of the Personnel and Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES:
Grachev Pavel Sergeevich, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, General Director of LLC UK Polyus;
Kamenskoy Igor Aleksandrovich, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, Managing Director of Renaissance Broker LLC;
Ernesto Ferlenghi, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, President of the Association of Italian Industrialists “Confederation of Italian Industry”.
1.4. Elect Ernesto Ferlenghi, a member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, President of the Association of Italian Industrialists “Confederation of Italian Industry”, as Chairman of the Personnel and Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES.
1.5. Amend the Regulations on the Strategy Committee of PJSC FGC UES (approved by the decision of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES on August 20, 2015 (Minutes No. 280) and the Regulations on the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES (approved by the decision of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES "FSK UES" 08/20/2015 (Minutes No. 280), setting out paragraphs 4.2 of these provisions in the following wording:
"4.2. The members of the Committee are elected by decision of the Board of Directors of the Company by a majority vote of the members of the Board of Directors participating in the meeting, from among the candidates presented by members of the Board of Directors of the Company.
Only individuals can be members of the Committee.
A member of the Committee may not be a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.
No more than 1 representative from the executive bodies of the Company may be elected to the Committee.”
1.6. Determine the composition of the Strategy Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES in the amount of 14 (fourteen) people.
1.7. Elect the following personal composition of the Strategy Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES:
Bulgakov Dmitry Stanislavovich, Deputy Head of the Directorate “Expert Center in the Fuel and Energy Complex” of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Russian Energy Agency” (Analytical Center of the Fuel and Energy Complex);
Vikhansky Alexander Eduardovich, Director of the Department for Interaction with Natural Monopolies LLC "UK Polyus";
Germanovich Alexey Andreevich, Advisor to the General Director of Investment Management CJSC;
Demin Andrey Aleksandrovich, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, member of the Management Board of PJSC Rosseti;
Oleg Yurievich Isaev, General Director of IDGC of Center PJSC;
Lebedev Sergey Yurievich, Director of the Strategic Development Department of PJSC Rosseti;
Olkhovich Evgeniy Aleksandrovich, Deputy Director of the Department of State Regulation of Tariffs, Infrastructure Reforms and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia;
Marina Nikolaevna Pichugina, Deputy Chairman of the Management Board of PJSC FGC UES;
Rusakov Maxim Viktorovich, member of the Board - head of the Department for the Development of Competitive Pricing of the Association of Non-Profit Partnership “Market Council”;
Snikkars Pavel Nikolaevich, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, Director of the Electric Power Industry Development Department of the Ministry of Energy of Russia;
Shatokhina Oksana Vladimirovna, Deputy General Director for Economics of PJSC Rosseti;
Erdyniev Anton Aleksandrovich, Deputy Director of the Electric Power Industry Development Department of the Russian Ministry of Energy;
Ernesto Ferlenghi, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, President of the Association of Italian Industrialists “Confederation of Italian Industry”;
Viktor Korneevich Yavorsky, General Director of Tori-Audit LLC.
1.8. Elect Pavel Nikolaevich Snikkars, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, Director of the Electric Power Industry Development Department of the Russian Ministry of Energy, as Chairman of the Strategy Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES.
1.9. Determine the composition of the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES in the amount of 14 (fourteen) people.
1.10. Elect the following personal composition of the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES:
Balaeva Svetlana Aleksandrovna, Deputy General Director for Investments of PJSC Rosseti;
Vladimir Fedorovich Gritsenko, member of the Presidium of the NP “OPORA RUSSIA”;
Domnich Vitaly Anatolyevich, head of department of the Department of State Regulation of Tariffs, Infrastructure Reforms and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Economic Development of Russia;
Zhuravlev Sergey Igorevich, Vice-President for work with government bodies of UK Polyus LLC;
Ilyenko Alexander Vladimirovich, member of the Management Board of SO UES OJSC, director for management of UES development of SO UES OJSC;
Kamenskoy Igor Aleksandrovich, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, Managing Director of Renaissance Broker LLC;
Kiselev Vasily Nikolaevich, Chairman of the Consumer Council under the Government Commission on Electric Power Industry;
Ruslan Raisovich Magadeev, Deputy Chief Engineer of Rosseti PJSC;
Mironosetsky Sergey Nikolaevich, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES;
Selivakhin Ivan Anatolyevich, financial director of ATS OJSC, advisor to the Chairman of the Board of the Association NP “Market Council”;
Sergei Aleksandrovich Semerikov, Deputy General Director for Development and Sales of Services of Rosseti PJSC;
Sergeev Sergey Vladimirovich, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, Deputy General Director for Capital Construction of PJSC Rosseti;
Vyacheslav Sergeevich Skulkin, Deputy Director of the Electric Power Industry Development Department of the Russian Ministry of Energy;
Filimonov Roman Evgenievich, Advisor to the Chairman of the Board
PJSC FGC UES.
1.11. Elect Igor Aleksandrovich Kamensky, member of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES, Managing Director of Renaissance Broker LLC, as Chairman of the Investment Committee of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES.
1.12. Approve the Work Plan of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES for the 2016-2017 corporate year in accordance with Appendix 1 to this protocol (hereinafter referred to as the Work Plan).
1.13. In the event that members of the Board of Directors of the Company receive additional proposals for the Work Plan, the Corporate Secretary of PJSC FGC UES shall ensure the collection and consolidation of such proposals, as well as the preparation of a draft decision of the Board of Directors of the Company to initiate changes to the Work Plan.
Voting results:
“FOR” - 10 votes, “AGAINST” - none (0 votes), “ABSTAINED” - none (0 votes).
Decision is made.

Question No. 2: On the approval of settlement agreements between PJSC FGC UES and PJSC Lenenergo, which are transactions in which there is an interest.
Decided:
2.1. Determine that the amount of debt to be settled within the framework of the settlement agreement in case No. A40-172145/2015-16-1017 between PJSC FGC UES and PJSC Lenenergo is 1,698,461,777 (One billion six hundred ninety-eight million four hundred sixty one thousand seven hundred seventy seven) rubles 52 kopecks, including:
- 1,309,030,650 (One billion three hundred nine million thirty thousand six hundred fifty) rubles 29 kopecks – the amount of debt under the contract for the provision of services for the transmission of electrical energy through UNEG networks dated January 25, 2012 No. 540/P/12-2230 (principal debt) for period from 12/01/2014 to 07/31/2015;
- 389,331,127 (Three hundred eighty-nine million three hundred thirty-one thousand one hundred twenty-seven) rubles 23 kopecks – the amount of the penalty for the period from 12/11/2014 to 03/02/2016;
- 100,000 (One hundred thousand) rubles – the amount of legal costs in the amount of 50% of the state duty paid by PJSC FGC UES when filing a claim in case No. A40-172145/2015-16-1017.
2.2. Approve the settlement agreement in case No. A40-172145/2015-16-1017 between PJSC FGC UES and PJSC Lenenergo (hereinafter referred to as Agreement 1), which is a transaction in which there is an interest, concluded on the following essential terms:
Parties to Agreement 1:
PJSC FGC UES (Plaintiff);
PJSC Lenenergo (Defendant).

Subject, price and other essential terms of Agreement 1 in accordance with Appendix 2 to this protocol.
Voting results:



Decision is made.

2.3. Determine that the amount of debt to be settled within the framework of the settlement agreement in case No. A40-36210/16-135-310 between PJSC FGC UES and PJSC Lenenergo is 3,354,968,605 (Three billion three hundred fifty-four million nine hundred sixty eight thousand six hundred five) rubles 09 kopecks, including:
- 3,136,412,939 (Three billion one hundred thirty-six million rubles four hundred twelve thousand nine hundred thirty-nine) rubles 21 kopecks - the amount of debt to the contract for the provision of services for the transmission of electrical energy through UNEG networks dated January 25, 2012 No. 540/P/12-2230 (main debt) for the period from 08/01/2015 to 12/31/2015;
- 153,675,419 (One hundred fifty-three million six hundred seventy-five thousand four hundred nineteen) rubles 12 kopecks – the amount of penalties and interest for the period from 08/11/2015 to 02/15/2016;
- 64,780,246 (Sixty-four million seven hundred eighty thousand two hundred and forty-six) rubles 76 kopecks – the amount of legal interest in accordance with Art. 317.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation for the period from 10/02/2015 to 02/15/2016;
- 100,000 (One hundred thousand) rubles – the amount of legal costs in the amount of 50% of the state duty paid by PJSC FGC UES when filing a claim in the case
No. A40-36210/16-135-3103.
2.4. Approve the settlement agreement in case No. A40-36210/16-135-310 between
PJSC FGC UES and PJSC Lenenergo (hereinafter referred to as Agreement 2), which is a transaction of interest, concluded on the following essential terms:
Parties to Agreement 2:
PJSC FGC UES (Plaintiff);
PJSC Lenenergo (Defendant).

Subject, price and other essential terms of Agreement 2 in accordance with Appendix 3 to this protocol.
Voting results:
“FOR” - 5 votes, “AGAINST” - none (0 votes), “ABSTAINED” - none (0 votes).
A decision on this issue is made by a majority vote of members of the Board of Directors, who are independent and not interested in the transaction.
Thus, 3 members of the Board of Directors who are recognized as persons interested in the transaction, as well as 2 members of the Board of Directors who are not independent directors, cannot take part in voting.
Decision is made.

Issue No. 3: On approval of the agreement on the repayment of debt of IDGC of the North Caucasus PJSC for services for the transmission of electrical energy via the UNEG and the agreement on the repayment of bill debt between FGC UES PJSC and IDGC of the North Caucasus PJSC, which are transactions in which there is interest.
Decided:
3.1. Determine that the amount of debt to be settled under the agreement to repay the debt of IDGC of the North Caucasus PJSC for services for the transmission of electrical energy via the UNEG between FGC UES PJSC and IDGC of the North Caucasus PJSC, which is a transaction in which there is an interest , amounts to 1,621,361,308 (One billion six hundred twenty-one million three hundred sixty-one thousand three hundred eight) rubles 89 kopecks, including:
- 1,568,543,328 (One billion five hundred sixty-eight million five hundred forty-three thousand three hundred twenty-eight) rubles 42 kopecks – the amount of debt under contracts for the provision of services for the transmission of electrical energy through the unified national (all-Russian) electrical network dated January 25, 2012 No. 581/P , dated 01/25/2012 No. 583/P, dated 01/25/2012 No. 584/P, dated 01/25/2012 No. 585/P, dated 06/19/2013 No. 753/P;
- 51,819,566 (Fifty-one million eight hundred nineteen thousand five hundred sixty-six) rubles 90 kopecks – the amount of the penalty/interest for the use of other people’s funds according to decisions of the Moscow Arbitration Court dated July 29, 2015 in case No. A40-74197/2015, dated August 6. 2015 and from 11/30/2015 in case No. A40-98145/2015, from 08/31/2015 and from 11/30/2015 in case No. A40-98141/2015, from 11/23/2015 in case No. A40-147347/2015, from 09/30/2015 in case No. A40-68302/2015, as well as decisions of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated 04/22/2015 in case No. A 40-147347/2015 and from 12/16/2015 in case No. A40-68302/2015;
- 998,413 (Nine hundred ninety-eight thousand four hundred and thirteen) rubles 57 kopecks – the amount of expenses for paying the state duty for cases No. A40-74197/2015, No. A40-98145/2015, No. A40-98141/2015, No. A40-147347/2015, No. A40-68302/2015.
3.2. Approve the agreement on the repayment of debt of IDGC of the North Caucasus PJSC for services for the transmission of electrical energy via the UNEG between FGC UES PJSC and IDGC of the North Caucasus PJSC (hereinafter referred to as Agreement 1), which is a transaction in which there is an interest, concluded on the following essential conditions:
Parties to Agreement 1:
PJSC FGC UES (Lender);

Subject, price and other essential terms of Agreement 1:
Subject, price and other essential terms of Agreement 1 in accordance with Appendix 4 to this protocol.
Voting results:

A decision on this issue is made by a majority vote of members of the Board of Directors, who are independent and not interested in the transaction.

Decision is made.

3.3. Determine that the amount of debt to be settled under the agreement on the repayment of bill debt between PJSC FGC UES and PJSC IDGC of the North Caucasus is 549,271,441 (Five hundred forty-nine million two hundred seventy-one thousand four hundred and forty-one) rubles 90 kopecks, including:
- 421,728,394 (Four hundred twenty-one million seven hundred twenty-eight thousand three hundred ninety-four) rubles 77 kopecks – the amount of the bill of exchange for bills of exchange presented for payment by PJSC FGC UES MR No. 11509, date of issue 03/30/2012 and MR No. 11508, date of issue 03/30/2012;
- 1,312,202 (One million three hundred twelve thousand two hundred two) rubles 53 kopecks - the amount of bill interest on bills of exchange MR No. 11509, date of execution 03/30/2012 and MR No. 11508, date of execution 03/30/2012 presented for payment by PJSC FGC UES;
- 126,030,844 (One hundred twenty-six million thirty thousand eight hundred and forty-four rubles) 60 kopecks - the amount of penalties and interest for late payment of bills based on the decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court dated 04/08/2014 in case No. A40-174713/13-102-1468 ;
- 200,000 (Two hundred thousand) – the amount of expenses for paying the state duty in case No. A40-174713/13-102-1468.
3.4. Approve the agreement on the repayment of bill debt between PJSC FGC UES and PJSC IDGC of the North Caucasus (hereinafter referred to as Agreement 2), which is a transaction in which there is an interest, concluded on the following essential terms:
Parties to Agreement 2:
PJSC FGC UES (Lender);
PJSC IDGC of the North Caucasus (Debtor).
Subject, price and other essential terms of Agreement 2:
Subject, price and other essential terms of Agreement 2 in accordance with Appendix 5 to this protocol.
Voting results:
“FOR” - 8 votes, “AGAINST” - none (0 votes), “ABSTAINED” - none (0 votes).
A decision on this issue is made by a majority vote of members of the Board of Directors, who are independent and not interested in the transaction.
Thus, 2 members of the Board of Directors who are not independent directors cannot take part in voting.
Decision is made.
2.3. Date of the meeting of the issuer's board of directors at which decisions were made: July 12, 2016.
2.4. Date of compilation and number of the minutes of the meeting of the board of directors: minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of PJSC FGC UES dated July 15, 2016 No. 331.

3. Signature
3.1. Deputy Chairman of the Board
PJSC FGC UES (based on a power of attorney
dated November 14, 2014 No. 500-14)
M.G. Tikhonova
(signature)
3.2. Date: July 18, 2016 M.P.

This message was provided directly by the subject of information disclosure and published in accordance with the Regulations on the disclosure of information by issuers of issue-grade securities or the Regulations on the requirements for the procedure and timing of disclosure of information related to the activities of joint-stock investment funds and management companies of mutual investment funds, as well as the content of the disclosed information . The Interfax Agency is not responsible for the content of the message and the consequences of its use.